Recent developments

It has been some time since you’ve heard from us, so I’m taking it upon myself to give you all an idea of what’s going on with Naev.

The first thing I should mention is that is is summer for Naev, and summer usually means a lull in activity. It has to do with lots of other things happening in summer, many of them outdoor ones. I think you get the idea.

That said, things have been happening since the 0.5.0 release. The original plan for the next version, 0.5.1, was, and I quote:

14:16 bobbens we can do safe lanes
14:16 bobbens for starters
14:16 bobbens although I’m not sure on the safe lane stuff how to procede
14:16 bobbens we can either go safe lane “simple implementation” first
14:16 bobbens for quick release
14:16 bobbens or go quadtrees and asteroids first
14:16 bobbens for a slower crazy release

Once this discussion was over, we promptly started working on completely different things. One of those things is the revised faction standing mechanic, described in a previous blarg post. But there is more.


For instance, work is ongoing on a revised disabling system. Up until 0.5.0, ships would become disabled once they sustained enough damage (to be precise, once armour fell below 20%), and that was the end of it. However, one of our team members (it was me) felt that this was undesirable, and designed something different. Rather than always being disabled through damage directly, ships now accrue “stress” damage, which builds up as weapons do damage, and falls naturally over time. Once stress damage equals the amount of armour the ship still has left, the ship becomes disabled. Assuming the ship is not destroyed afterward, it will come back online after a certain amount of time.

The important part in the above is that stress damage needs to reach the amount of armour health left on the ship. The direct implication of this is that ships with low health are more easily disabled than ships with high health, without tying the concepts of “low” and “high” to the ship’s maximum amount of health. This means that a small ship can be reliably disabled without running the risk of destroying it, for example.

The introduction of stress damage in itself also gives us the opportunity to differentiate weapons further. In practice, this means that most weapons will do minimal amounts of disable damage, much less than their actual physical damage, so that it’s almost impossible to disable a ship before killing it. On the other hand, certain other weapons will deal a lot of stress damage and limited amounts of physical damage, so that stress damage easily builds up toward the critical level.


One of our current efforts is to make missiles more meaningful while at the same time not placing too much emphasis on them. In 0.5.0, most missiles are mostly useless, for various reasons. For instance, damage was low and the likelihood of missiles hitting fast targets or targets with jammers was rather low. One of our team members (it was me again) came up with an alternative missile system that would allow missiles to be more useful while hopefully not be too dominating.

In the new system, a missile weapon must acquire a lock on the target before it can fire. To acquire this lock, the target must be kept within the missile lockon area, which is an arc in front of the ship for normal launchers and everywhere for turreted launchers. The time the launcher takes to lock on depends on the lockon time defined for that launcher, and on the level of stealth of the target. As a general rule, small targets are more stealthy than bigger ones. So while an interceptor missile might lock on to a capital ship very quickly, a heavy torpedo would take a very long time to lock on to a fighter. Stealth is further affected by electronic warfare outfits such as passive scramblers and, to be implemented, jammers that must be activated and provide a short-term boost.

Once fired, missiles are quite good at finding their targets. Unlike most of the old missiles, all missiles now predict where their target is going to be, so unless the target can actually outmaneuver the missile, the missile will usually hit. The new missiles also do considerably more damage, so being hit by one can be quite painful. The aim is that most missiles are optimally suited to a certain class of ship, however, dealing too little damage to seriously hurt targets bigger than that and being too slow and sluggish to catch faster ones.

Ship health

A somewhat minor change, but perhaps worth mentioning here is the overhaul of ship health. Where ship armour and shields more or less linearly increased as the ships got bigger and heavier, one of our team members (it was me, sorry) felt a different philosophy should be followed.

Small ships  now rely mainly on their maneuverability and their shields, as before. Their hulls are made out of bread, relatively speaking, so only a few hits will be enough to destroy them. Avoiding fire in an engagement is key to survival.

Big ships have received substantial cuts to their shielding. While they still have more shielding in absolute terms than smaller ships, the increase becomes less and less as ships get bigger. On the other hand, armour has been drastically increased. The idea here is that big ships, as big and lumbering as they are, will run out of shields in most serious encounters, but survive on armour for a considerable time after that. When combat is over shields will come back up but armour will not. In this manner, capital ships will get worn down between engagements, and will eventually have to return to a friendly planet or station to make repairs. Of course, this assumes combat will be sporadic and intense, as opposed to constant and niggling (as is currently the case!). All in good time.

I should also mention that shield regeneration has been boosted across the board, hopefully enough to make the regeneration actually matter in the middle of combat. I’m sure we’ll be tweaking that more in the future.


Soromid space

Soromid space.

Following contributions of some great ship models by Viruk, a new faction has been added to the Naev galaxy. The Soromid already existed as a lore writeup previously, but now they also own ships, stations and planets. In the future, they will also receive their own weapon specialization, and of course their own missions.

You can see a map of their territory to the right. It is located in the north of the galaxy, where previously there were only empty systems. Not anymore!







bobbens' toe

bobbens' toe.

Our team leader bobbens is working on a personal project as well. You can see the result here.










That’s all for now!

Share on RedditTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on FacebookShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

10 comments to Recent developments

  • DarthKev

    Ooo, so many new things! I’m actually looking forward to trying out missiles now. I can’t wait!

  • Dash_Merc

    Awesome. I just heard of this game today. It’s not as intricate as EV Nova, but the graphics and gameplay are pretty stunning. I will definitely be getting heavily addicted to this game. :)

    @ DarthKev, it’s good to see other EV forum users checking out the scene. :)

  • Matt

    oooh… I’ve done that before. Good luck for the next 6 weeks Bobbens. In the mean time, you have an excuse to gimp like Long John — Arr.

  • crimson_shade

    Nice….and ouch.

  • fan

    next release sounds great so far 😀 i´d love to see you let go of the idea of the hyperspace for the next release. how about making one big space where you actually have to travel the distances between the solar systems? there could be one interstellar and one interplanetar drive where time would pass different. from planet to planet it could take a few seconds and from system to system with the other drive one minute per light year. flying could be made more interesting with asteroids and big komets you got to avoid or discover. you also wouldn´t have to travel along the space map routes as long you don´t have to refuel. just an idea :) and get well soon

  • DarthKev

    It just occurred to me I haven’t heard anything recently about when the rest of the tutorials will be finished. I’m especially interested in the Advanced Combat tutorial as I’d like to learn how to use fighters effectively.

    @ Dash_Merc: How’d you know I was on the ASW Forums? I don’t recognize your username. You a lurker?

    @ Matt: You wouldn’t happen to be Matt Burch, would you? 😛

  • anonymous coward

    Is there going to be a way for people to participate who refuse to register for gmail or forums, (aside from possibly via git checkout)?

  • BTAxis

    There’s always the IRC.

  • DoomedTrader

    I must be the only one that doesn’t like the shield changes for big ships. I see shield tanking versus armor tanking as different playstyles…sure, make them balanced…but don’t force those that prefer one approach to be limited to certain sized ships. I’m currently playing with the larger ships and completely ignore armor.

  • Matt

    @ DarthKev

    “You wouldn’t happen to be Matt Burch, would you? ”

    Hah. No I’m not. Besides, it’s 10:34 at night. Why am I still looking at this damn blog?

Leave a Reply




You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>